Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (33883)	12/1/2000 3:28:42 PM
From: techguerrilla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35685

QCOM up nicely today . . . . I wonder if I should trim some of it into this rally. Stock and Jan35's in my IRA. Um! Thinking and porchin'. I have a question, though! If a person is "just porchin'," where is that person hanging out? These two porches are giving me a split personality. If there was ever proof that liberals and conservatives can't get along, it was clearly demonstrated to me by this "porch division" fiasco. Religion, money, and politics are always guaranteed to divide even the most decent of people. Just porchin' and, of course, "thinking under the influence." /john

To: Poet who wrote (33883)	12/2/2000 5:12:59 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

Hi Poet, You say master of invective. I say I'm extremely good at providing accurate descriptions based solely on her own words. I feel absolutely no shame in using significant, relevant facts that accurately describe words & deeds when responding to folks who lie, mislead, & distort facts as part of an agenda to maliciously denigrate another person. Perhaps a harsh reality is revealed, but the descriptions are quite accurate by definition. Bottom line, the truth hurts, particularly when one chooses to stray far away form it while trying to denigrate another. From my perspective the person who has the established history of malicious personal attacks amplified by lies, distortions & intentional deceit should feel ashamed. It appears you have no problems with the actions that caused my replies, as I have noted absolutely no admonishment of their words & deeds. Apparently this type of behavior has your blessing? However, you have been extremely vocal in my factually supported, accurate descriptions of the words & deeds of people like this. I would be ashamed of supporting these people while being silent or somehow justifying these deplorable actions. Even more so if I had participated in this kind of misdeed as well. If you wish to debate my comments in the post you have attacked, I will gladly provide a list of verbatim quotes that prompted my reply. It could cause more folks to feel ashamed for sure. Ö¿Ö