Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ratan lal who wrote (120141)	12/6/2000 4:22:21 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

OT Hi Ratan, RE: Cool Post Thank you RE: " 14th amendment of equal rights " You're right. Bush did. But the US SC didn't bother with this, because the FL SC had asked Bush if he wanted a manual recount and Bush said no. Thus, there was no 14th amendment issue. RE: "I am not sure about the power and authority fo SOS and whether that can be challenged in the courts" The US Constitution gives power to the Electoral, not exactly to the "will of the people", so this is where FL SC messed up. Blah. But the FL Constitution gives precedent to the "will of the people", so this was where the disconnect seemed to occur. The FL laws seem to conflict with the US Constitution. Translated: it seems to me the FL SC ruling was correct when measured by FL law, but incorrect when measured by the US Constitution. Regards, Amy J