Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scrapps who wrote (98006)	12/1/2000 10:13:09 PM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Well, I guess that settles that. Now what's this about Nassau COunty? lol.

To: Scrapps who wrote (98006)	12/1/2000 10:13:56 PM
From: JamesB	Respond to of 769667

That seems pretty clear and straightforward. It also seems to be the law, so no doubt the dems will disregard that little detail and proceed anyhow.

To: Scrapps who wrote (98006)	12/1/2000 10:22:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

The FEC is regulation, not law. They would have to counter sue Florida in a few months. TP

To: Scrapps who wrote (98006)	12/1/2000 10:46:29 PM
From: CatLady	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769667

This statute applies in all jurisdictions and to all elections. It specifically prohibits any person acting under color of law from denying "the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission on any record or paper relating to any application, registration, or other act requisite to voting, if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified under State law to vote in such election." Is a voter id number material? If it isn't, why was it required on the application?