Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (33972)	12/3/2000 5:34:31 AM
From: basilides	Respond to of 35685

Laszlo/THX! I'm about ready to prod LJ a little by: bonnuss 6/5/98 9:57 pm Msg: 40352 of 378568 ...later this evening when I post to "draw her out of her lair," when I'm confident she'll have her claws (and teeth) BARED!! Ha! AND: is this the crazy out-there msg you referenced? Indeed, I will post when she rears her ugly head again against any of us. This is LadyJane's goodnight message June 4 at about 2:30 am: Flame to our "little hearts' content" is it? How about this one: Your post was a flame. You felt quite comfortable posting it. How are you different? And how the **** did you conclude that your message was of ANY friggin' benefit to DELL-watchers? Makes you a hypocrite, don't you think? I certainly do. NOW, don't do it again. And NEVER again use that dismissive tone about women or I will FIND a way to rip your throat out with words. Do NOT play with the ladies. Some of us make a hobby of ripping dipwads' b*lls off. Since you just MAY need what passes for yours some day, I suggest you heed my words. Got that? post.messages.yahoo.com

To: Poet who wrote (33972)	12/3/2000 5:44:40 AM
From: basilides	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

My credibility has nothing to do with anything.

To: Poet who wrote (33972)	12/3/2000 7:35:53 AM
From: basilides	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

Poet (assuming I am not immediately on ignore): First, I am not wstera or anyone else who has ever posted here against bonnuss. Second, I have nothing against you personally, no quarrel, no issues. Third, until now I have simply been an occasional lurker on this board and others. My only purpose in posting the links I have brought here is to demonstrate beyond any doubt that bonnuss has a long history of deliberately antagonistic behavior towards other individuals. She exhibits a very clear and consistent pattern everywhere she goes. One of the most important and significant features of this pattern is that she will invariably, sooner or later, turn on those who befriend her. Several of her staunchest, most steadfast defenders on other venues are now her most hated and vilified enemies. There is ample proof of this available all over Yahoo. This woman is no heroine. She has succeeded, it appears, in gathering around her a small coterie of individuals who seem most united by their resentment and envy of other posters...Voltaire, particularly (whatever Voltaire's faults or merits may be, he is certainly a more generous, humane, and tolerant person than bonnuss could ever be). I guess I shouldn't be surprised at that. But I am amazed that people with some sense find anything in her behavior to admire or respect, applaud or encourage. It is easy to unite occasionally behind resentment, bitterness, and envy, because we all feel it from time to time. But to stay united behind it, you have to be more or less permanently motivated by it. Is that what the posters on this board are all about? As a person who has witnessed bonnie's "career" of doing precious little beyond mooching for stock tips, antagonizing those she hates (nearly everyone, sooner or later), and trying to attract attention to herself by any means imaginable, for years, I can only shake my head at the people here allying themselves with her as if she has anything constructive to offer (she's never given any past evidence of it anywhere else), and as if they will somehow be immune the day she finally turns her venom around on them. And sooner or later, she will. That's all I'm trying to tell you.