Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (250)	12/3/2000 10:52:43 PM
From: Carl R.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 644

Here is some testimony as to the types of problems I have mentioned, ballots altered by handling, dimples created accidently by those who did not intend to cast a vote, and lack of repeatability caused by subjective interpretations of ballots: cnn.com By the way, the Democrat witness testified that dimpled chads could indeed be caused by handling. By the way, I noticed that one of the attorneys involved in the final argument representing "a voter" suggested that counting only Democrat strongholds would be unfair, so I suppose this opens the door for Sauls to order a statewide recount, should he believe it is appropriate. I also noticed that the expert on behalf of the Democrats demonstrated how easy it was to create a dimpled chad instead of punching the chad out, but was embarrassed when he was forced to admit that he was doing the demonstration with a thicker card than was actually used, and that the thicker card made it harder to punch through. Getting caught pulling a cheap stunt like that won't help their credibility. Carl