Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SBHX who wrote (259)	12/4/2000 1:49:56 PM
From: Bosco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 644

Hi SbH - I think these 9 justices are the best politicians [in a respectful way, of course] this land has produced. By setting the FLSC's ruling aside by saying the USSC doesn't fully understand the former's ground for its respective ruling, they are not saying the ruling was right or wrong, with a big maybe hanging out there. This is not an overrule by a normal sense of the concept. Therefore, no one can pin anything on the USSC's ruling. No one can accuse the "state right" advocates for being inconsistent and no one can use it as a case of precedent! At the same time, it will reign in any attempt by the state court to become an activist. Quite a master stroke! The real question is how this ruling will impact Judge Sauls's ruling. Already, he has to postpone his judgement in light of this. Right now, VP Gore is not doing so good. best, Bosco