Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100333)	12/4/2000 1:52:54 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

My guess is that the Broward hand job should be nullified.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100333)	12/4/2000 1:54:17 PM
From: md1derful	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

but Ken...you would agree that the count as it stands now is back to 930?? or am I missing something..please explain doc

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100333)	12/4/2000 2:00:14 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

If the FSC had no right to reset the date of the certification, I believe that equitable relief mandates a return to the status quo ante, i.e., what would have been the certification had the FSC not interfered. Now, it may be that the additional material is usable at trial, as you suggest, but I am not sure. It certainly weakens some of the cases, since if the FSC had no sufficient reason to interfere in the certification, the Gore campaign is unlikely to have any reason to question what has been certified, and if the argument for mandatory hand counts was not found compelling by the USSC, it is not likely to be compelling at a lower level. If one regards the USSC decision as a kind of guidance, it will have a marked effect on the contest......