Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ratan lal who wrote (40417)	12/4/2000 3:19:20 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

"The problem is that changes were made WITHOUT the voters KNOWLEDGE or PERMISSION" Changes to what? Again, the applications were changed, NOT the ballots. That is the only point I was making. How the law will handle it, I am not sure. IF they throw out approx 15,000 voters because of a technicallity on the APPLICATIONS they will dis-enfranchise a lot of people who did nothing wrong. The courts may see that (throwing out all absentee votes) as the best solution. My bet is that they will let the votes count.