Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: abstract who wrote (21820)	12/4/2000 4:01:30 PM
From: Jill	Respond to of 65232

I'm sure ed will answer, but it basically seems to mean, 'This is not in our bailywick and should not be, and we're slapping your hand because we think you over-reached, why don't you go back and reconsider your decision and be "clear" about it this time" Meanwhile next judge ruling at 4:30 p.m. What a nutsy time

To: abstract who wrote (21820)	12/4/2000 4:06:57 PM
From: edamo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

abstract: vacate= to annul, to render an act void remand= to send back or recommit in essence: fsc decision voided(vacated) and sent back(remanded)by a higher power(ussc) so they may reconsider and correct their error......fsc stepped on federal law with their decision, if not, the ussc has no power to intervene...they did, so they must.... can't read baker's mind on "time out"....merely reading and comprehending the ussc opinion as it relates to the law... all else is spin, be it the media, baker, christopher, et al...