Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (120528)	12/4/2000 5:32:16 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

John, The judge made it clear. Prove that a recount will give you the election, and then we can do the recount. What a moron. I don't see how the absentee ballot case can lose for Gore, short of massive corruption in the FL judiciary (which of course is not out of the question.) Scumbria

To: Road Walker who wrote (120528)	12/4/2000 8:04:11 PM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

John, Re: The most interesting part (to me) was that Boise and crew didn't prove that a recount could change the result I find that interesting too as they seemed to focus on the same old line of 'every vote must be counted' rather than the more technical detail of how likely the result would be different if a recount is conducted(which is what the judge wanted to hear apparently). Well they may still have a final chance as the Florida Supreme Court seems to more incline to their reasoning based on the last case. gary