To: Raymond Duray who wrote (4945 ) 12/6/2000 4:34:28 AM From: Ilaine Respond to of 6710 I appreciate your correcting my memory of what Mr. Welch said, but it wasn't necessary to suggest that my reading is confined to the Drudge Report, the Washington Times, and the Las Vegas Sun (never actually heard of that). For news mostly I read the Washington Post and the New York Times, and my faulty memory is my own fault. As for mischaracterizing what you think about Bush, I see that it could be interpreted as my saying that you thought that Gore wasn't fit to govern, but that was poor sentence construction. I do think that the events of the past few weeks have shown that Gore is unfit to govern. After watching what transpired in Judge Clark's courtroom last night, at least now I know for a fact that when any Gore supporter says, "we just want all the votes to be counted," that is an outright lie. You can pretend that Gore isn't behind it, but that, too, is a lie. Just as the pretense that Gore had nothing to do with the timing of the release of George W. Bushs' old DWI is an outright lie. All the pretty words we were taught about democracy and patriotism and our nation are just words that make speeches sound nicer. The flag is a prop. Gore doesn't give - - - I am not going to use crude words - - - he simply does not care about the votes in Seminole County and Martin County that were cast by perfectly innocent voters. He is asking in Seminole County to throw out 15,000 absentee ballots. At most, 2000 applications for absentee ballots had their ID numbers written in. So Gore wants to disenfranchise more voters than you say Bush does, and we haven't even thrown Martin County into the equation because I don't know the facts. As for the argument that the Democrats were treated differently than the Republicans - the Republicans cared enough to go to the Elections Board and take it upon themselves to find out what was going on. The Election Board didn't call them up preferentially. It's just another lie.