Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scrapps who wrote (104477)	12/7/2000 4:10:13 PM
From: Pullin-GS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I hate it when that happens. ;-) <GGG>

To: Scrapps who wrote (104477)	12/7/2000 4:29:55 PM
From: Dave Gore	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

Scrapps, don't be ignorant. I was just reporting what I saw. It's called reality. FYI, I hope the absentee votes don't get thrown out. I think its just a technicality and wrong if theey are. Throw people in jail if they broke the law or fine them, but count the votes. But...I am a realist that if you don't follow the registration procedures as laid out by Florida law in applying for an absentee ballot, you may not get the right to vote. To a judge, the law is the law. The only thing I agree with is that anybody breaking the law should be punished appropriately and as many votes as possible should count. Learn to read and think, buddy.

To: Scrapps who wrote (104477)	12/7/2000 4:38:47 PM
From: amadeus	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

republicans - "all the votes should count". they should not be thrown out on a technicality. its the will of the people that is paramount. even if it is a violation of law, its not the voters fault. ok. now can we apply this standard to the whole election? or just where republican votes are at stake? parallel between an improperly prepared ballot application by the republican party, and a ballot improperly prepared by the democratic party in palm beach. how can you argue one side and not the other? again, no moral consistency. ok, let's hear the spin.