Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (105078)	12/8/2000 1:01:22 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

To vote is, by the rules here, to clearly and cleanly remove the chad. That's the difference. I laid it out already. To count even a single vote that was uncast and unintended in reality, is a definition of election fraud. This is all very similar to why our legal system lets bad guys go despite their obvious but unproven guilt. Better to let many go free than allow one innocent to suffer. If you make the voter aware by instruction, that dimples may count as votes, and to get a new ballot if he/she's mistakenly left one...then fine, your simple logic could become correct. This is not the case as it stands. Dan B