Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (81029)	12/8/2000 9:36:49 AM
From: isopatch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

Doug. Question. Canada is likely to twin that pipeline 400 mi east, (in the next few years) to bring south, through western Canada, the huge probable NG reserves in the McKenzie Delta. OR...would it be politically possible to take a serious look at the (likely) more cost effective option of inking a bilateral agreement with Canada to link all the Prudhoe and McKenzie gas into one trunk line up north and run it south together? Most of the time, there's no doubt that Nationalistic barriers would prevail. On the other hand, I've got to wonder, IF supply becomes enough of a crisis this winter to awaken people, would it be possible to rise beyond the usual barriers and "cut a deal" that would effectively address the reality of the massive and increasing NG demand already locked in for the years ahead... Just a thought. Iso