Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OX who wrote (42001)	12/8/2000 2:13:01 PM
From: OpusX	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44573

by the way, that gann stuff (which I know next to nothing about) I read somewhere (dang! I forget where) that Gann is worthless for this reason: he uses angles for instance 45 degree angles figure big in his work. What I read was if you take a chart and simply compress or expand it your angles would change as well for instance 45 degree would change to 33 degree or whatever. If this is true, which it is just try it on a chart, then using x degree angles as signals would be bogus...no? Opus

To: OX who wrote (42001)	12/8/2000 2:20:50 PM
From: Gary E	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 44573

I think your right...... In order to turn $50,000 into $1.5 mil requires earning 29,000 pts...(each pt is 50$) $1,500,000 - 50,000 ---------- 1,450,000 /50 = 29,000 pts.... Anyone care to show me how to do that ?