Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (106637)	12/8/2000 8:34:02 PM
From: MasonS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

TP...the votes have been counted. What Gore has been asking is for a fourth chance to "mine votes". Thank you, but I don't need anyone trying to "devine" who I voted for. If you had any common sense at all...and if you have watched those hand counts...I don't know how you could believe that it is anything other than biased and totally unfair.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (106637)	12/8/2000 8:34:02 PM
From: Dr. Doktor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

<<For the last month Gore has been asking to count the votes. It is insane to think you can know who wins an election without counting the votes. Fortunately, sometimes a body comes by to separate the insane from the rest of America and the votes will finally be counted.>> Counting the votes is impossible. Who's counting and by what standard? It'll never, never stand up to the USSC. You can't count non-votes as Gore votes. That's why the first machine re-count will always be the most accurate count in this election.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (106637)	12/8/2000 8:34:03 PM
From: MasonS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Edit

To: TigerPaw who wrote (106637)	12/8/2000 8:59:12 PM
From: chalu2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Whether we agree with them or not, several judges this week--Democrats--issued rulings adverse to Al Gore. Of course, we will hear no apologies form those here who skewered these honest public servants as political hacks, or worse. Despite what many partisan ignoramuses have said here, it is not rare for a judge to rule against his political parties' interests-impartiality is a Judge's sworn duty. This is why I repose far more trust in the decisions and authority of the Judiciary than in any partisan political body.