Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: im a survivor who wrote (23526)	12/9/2000 9:50:46 AM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 65232

ONLY SOLUTION IN FL: prescription for statistical test very complicated layout, fraught with inexact aspects you have 67 counties and each has undervoted ballots every ballot must be examined by both Dem and Repub person each person provides a final tally per precinct that provides balance within each precinct (anyone who thinks each paired tally is identical belongs in an idealistic mental institution) one dimension is the county nested within the county are the precincts second dimension is the two examiners you have a nested two-way layout for Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) but with Random Effects from examiners Hypothesis: Bush won more votes produces a statistical F-test I have hated random effect ANOVA for two decades they are too complicated and uncertain the method is used when different industrial machines produce widgets at least you have some control over uncertainty yet zero legal precedent hire me, same rate as Boies, and worth twice as much / Jim