SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (108078)12/9/2000 3:24:43 PM
From: MasonS  Respond to of 769667
 
"the Republican Party is against welfare to families that can't take care of their children"

No...but they are for a system that if you can work...you should work...it's not the responsibility of the government to support those that are able to help themselves.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (108078)12/9/2000 3:26:53 PM
From: slave  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
If they can not take care of their babies , they should not have them..If they are to lazy to work or to stupid to understand birth control..May i suggest sterilization of anyone on welfare that has an additional baby...Take care of it yourself and do what you like, ask me to pay for it , i say STERILIZATION MANDATORY...



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (108078)12/9/2000 3:32:27 PM
From: RON BL  Respond to of 769667
 
. Last time I checked, the Republican Party is against welfare to families that can't take care of their children.

Patricia everyone wants to help. If you ask me if I work 8 hrs in a day am I willing to give 2 of those hrs to help the unfortunate than the answers is yes. In times of disaster than even more. But if you demand that I give 6 hrs of my work to a bloated bureaucracy that spends 80 % of every dollar on itself than "hell no I wont go "
What is even worse is the fact that you instill dependency and an endless cycle of poverty. My friend taught in inner city Detroit a real white idealist. He gave up. He asked his class what their goals in life were. One young girl said to have my own social worker like my mama



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (108078)12/9/2000 3:41:24 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
I don't need your respect. What I want is for you to respect LIFE.

And NO you cannot tell me that in order to be pro-life I have to be for or against anything else. That is only your opinion. Just as I do not take part in what FEW killings of abortionists that take place, neither do I march on the state capital to stop the state from putting to death a convicted murderer.

Your pictures don't show me anything new and inventive. The pictures are purposely inflammatory.

yes you are so correct. Pictures of murdered children ARE inflammatory...and also as horrible as the holocaust of the Jews in WW2.(of course there are people that say the pics of the holocaust are ""inventive"", as you call it, too)



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (108078)12/14/2000 12:11:10 AM
From: FastC6  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
you lost...salute your new President: George W. Bush

. .