SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (23729)12/9/2000 10:57:36 PM
From: Michael Kimmel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
I don't know if that's true.
According to the discussion on Fox, there are 6 days
after the Electors are put in place before the vote.
There may be no change to the Electors during those
6 days.

Now, if these dates are set by the Constitution, and from
this discussion, I believe that's the case, and we now
know that a Court cannot rewrite Law, my guess is that
the USSC effectively put an end to this today.

The feeling was, they would not have halted the recount...
specifying that it cannot continue until a USSC ruling,
if they didn't already have the votes.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (23729)12/9/2000 10:57:38 PM
From: Dealer  Respond to of 65232
 
public outcry will be huge if the clock just runs out
even Republicans wont be satisfied


If it takes a clock to put an end to this, I will be satisfied. Trust me!

dealie



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (23729)12/9/2000 11:01:20 PM
From: abstract  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
oh goody - Jim Willie thinks the Supreme Court can dispense with the Constitution:

USSC has the authority to slide that date and other dates
I see no problem in sliding all dates by 4 days


"The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the United States."

Oh - I see - it is okay for Republicans to violate the sanctity of the branches of government and one Republican also thinks it is okay for the Court to make up new rules as it goes along.

What goes around comes around.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (23729)12/10/2000 12:36:14 AM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
The founding fathers had a reason for setting dates in the rule book. You can't be messing with how long the games is played. Nothing would get done, it could go on for months, and the all the talk overseas about how foolish we look would become true.

G