Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lawdog who wrote (109508)	12/10/2000 12:50:42 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 769667

Sorry stupid, you are wrong again.

To: lawdog who wrote (109508)	12/10/2000 12:52:28 PM
From: Frank Griffin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Gosh, lawdog, you are talking about our President-elect. Be nice and show him honor.

To: lawdog who wrote (109508)	12/10/2000 1:06:30 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Legal questions: If the election situation had been the reverse in Broward County, in other words had Bush been looking for votes, and two of the three people examining the dimples were Republicans rather than Democrats, do you think the results would have been the same as the real recount that occurred, or different? If you accept the legal definition of "intent", the state of one's mind at the time one carries out an action, then can an argument be formed that if the voter using a punch-card ballot fails to perform the action of punching out the card, that voter's intention cannot possibly be divined due to the fact that an action must follow an intention in order to argue the intention? Thanks in advance.