Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (129446)	12/10/2000 10:00:20 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570523

Harry, Ted , what truth are you talking about, your version or the truth according to the constitution. If that is the question, I think it is obvious, the truth according to the USSC; will take precident over your version. Do you really think that the USSC is going to get away with this travesty unscathed? Scumbria

To: hmaly who wrote (129446)	12/10/2000 10:19:52 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1570523

Ted , what truth are you talking about, your version or the truth according to the constitution. If that is the question, I think it is obvious, the truth according to the USSC; will take precident over your version. Harry, The Constitution requires that all the votes be counted; however, at the time it was drafted, chads and dimples etc. did not exist. So the Constitution's requirements are subject to interpretation...and the Supreme Ct. appears to be basing its interpretation purely along ideological lines. And please do not talk to me about my version vs the truth....the truth has been lost in this mess. ted