Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should George W. Bush Concede? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (462)	12/11/2000 10:43:29 AM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 554

Well he is Dead now, But taht shouldn't matter a lot being so many States let Dead people vote. Jim

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (462)	12/11/2000 2:22:09 PM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 554

GZ; I'm listening to the arguments and questions of the S.C. and so far I have a hard time believing they are so stupid. But the fact is they are either stupid or the Judges are trying to evade the issue, and pass the buck. ---------- The first Bush Lawyer argued that the machine counts were at least objective. That's wrong but he was not challenged with any question The only way a machine count could be "objective" is if it was programmed to tabulate the amount of "rejected votes" in each county then assign them on a pro-rated basis via the percentage of the counted ones in that same county. ---------- Even this type of objectivity would not deal with the Butter Fly votes ( over votes ) unless all the over votes due to the butterfly fiasco were assigned on a percentages base to the between the Two candidates that "were within the butter fly" via the percentages that those candidates received of counted votes in that county. ----------- That would be Objectivity I would prefer to see it re-voted, as a problem is that no matter who wins the way this thing is going if any thing goes wrong during the next 4 years all of this will come back with a vengeance. Jim