SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bosco who wrote (8886)12/12/2000 9:47:19 AM
From: Steve Lee  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 30051
 
I am under the impression it gives them the discretion to count a machine-rejected vote, so long as the clear intent of the voter is apparent.

They don't have discretion to count votes where the intent is not clear. If someone held a gun to your head and showed you a dimpled vote and said "tell me the clear intent of the voter or I will shoot you", how confident would you be?



To: Bosco who wrote (8886)12/12/2000 10:22:13 AM
From: Sabrejet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Hey Bosco! What's your take on the fact that the FLSC allowed a "partial" hand recount in allowing the 158 votes from Miami-Dade? That issue has been given very little press. That 20% "recount" also came from 90% democratic pricincts. The other 80% it is believed, is at worst 52-48% for Bush. Some put that percentage much higher.

There's something wrong with that.

Sabre!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News