Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (122356)	12/12/2000 7:08:26 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"The obvious way to represent all voters was to split the electors, but that would have made Bush lost. So instead, they chose to disenfranchise half the voters and accomplish their real agenda- to put a Republican in the White House" I don't think that's the way the law works. Only Nebraska can split electors and they haven't done it lately. (NH?) I don't like the idea of circumventing the voters as much as you do. That's what happening all around. This is not good. Regardless of who wins the state, I think it should be based on some vote count...machine, recount, hand recount, something. At this point I still hoping for a resolution where the electors are chosen by the "some" vote. OTOH, the Legislature had no chioice but to find some electors as an insurance policy. I hope they won't have to send them. What's your take on the USSC taking their time on the decision? Maybe they are devising a way to count? Flip a coin? Jim

To: Scumbria who wrote (122356)	12/12/2000 8:48:51 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, Why so much hate? You're a environmentalist driving a SUV, a vegetarian eating meat. Being a liberal I bet you moved to Colorado so you could keep your guns. True colors for a liberal. steve