Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Left Wing Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: YlangYlangBreeze who wrote (960)	12/13/2000 2:23:02 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6089

Ylang: <<Acceptance speech? Just a second. let me pull this shotgun out of my throat.>> LOL ... well put ... ditto. I'll definitely be watching even less TV news for the next four years. For my real-time presidential news, I'll probably continue to follow the Slate sight for the stupid statements the idiot makes i.e. "Bushisms." BTW: Question for you et al: I still don't understand why the anti-abortion plank in the Republican platform exists. The reason I don't understand is that I can't figure out how outlawing abortion puts money into Republicans' pockets. Or power? Towards what end? More people brought into the world will become future Republicans? Further, I see a conundrum in that if and when all women are forced to give birth by law -- even those who can't afford to raise/support other new human beings for 18(?) years -- will the Republicans condone public support (i.e. welfare) to assist the parent(s) in financing the lives of these new people? I think not -- but, again, I could be one of those that will just never really get the jist of the 'noble Republican' ideology ... <g> Good day to all, now ... 'b-i-a' ###