SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (8872)12/13/2000 5:52:56 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10042
 
Again, people who don't follow explicit instructions have no right to expect that their ballot will be properly counted.

I have to objection to substituting this for the intent-of-the-voter standard for future elections. I know it's what the Reps want plus it has the advantages of ease of implementation and counting efficiency. Efficiency is a good thing. And surely it will pass muster with the Supreme Court. Of course, you guys have to promise not to whine when some absentee military ballots get kicked out along with all the Dem retards and feebs.

Karen



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (8872)12/13/2000 7:42:31 PM
From: ThirdEye  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10042
 
Ron, you do go on and on sometimes, as if you've got everything all figured out.

Again, people who don't follow explicit instructions have no right to expect that their ballot will be properly counted

Perhaps you missed the fact that some of the hullabaloo we've been going over for the past five weeks in Florida was about the fact that the explicit instructions directly contradicted the design of the ballot in two different counties.

So even if the voter DID follow the explicit instructions, they produced overvotes. Now do you understand why your(AND Sandra Day O'Connor) simplistic utopian superior attitude doesn't connect with what actually ahppened on the ground?