SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cosmicforce who wrote (4903)12/14/2000 4:57:44 AM
From: average joe  Respond to of 28931
 
The Tungasku Event was obviously a small pipe like body intruding into the Siberian platform. There is ample evidence of this at the site.

Eyewitness accounts describe the event as a very bright light in the form of a pipe or cylinder. Such shapes are not typical of meteorites. One account described two explosions which would be typical of an energy release

Why has the conduit not been found? Probably because the size of the conduit was no wider than a human forearm. The "Carswell Gastrobleme" in the Athabasca Basin until very recently was also thought to be an impact structure.

At Carswell 50,000 cubic kilometres of sand was ejected out of the conduit. It has never been explained geologically.



To: cosmicforce who wrote (4903)12/14/2000 6:40:00 AM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
Large perturbations (like 20 Megatons equivalent energy) might cause matter to shake apart

Here is a really interesting description of the asteroid entry. Fascinating!

astro.hr



To: cosmicforce who wrote (4903)12/14/2000 5:38:52 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
Those who have studied the physical evidence left by the Tunguska episode have grounds for reasonable debate, which I won't join, as I know nothing about it. Since there is no physical evidence of any kind that would serve as grounds for debate about the origins, nature, or existence of hell, I don't see much point in trying to explain it.