Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SILICON STORAGE SSTI Flash Mem -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: add who wrote (1379)	12/19/2000 4:34:42 PM
From: Allegoria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1881

Hello again thread, it has been a long time since I have posted on this thread. I use to LOVE SSTI way back then... I am absolutely surprised, as many of you must be at the current price of STTI. "Ridic." I have been out of "LTB&H SSTI" since just after the split and have only traded her occasionally. I do wish you all the best of luck. IMO Adds previous post is right on. The problem with SSTI seems more than general market morass. I am sorry to say that the market is saying that they do not believe the unbelievably good story coming out of SSTI. And I think the market is discounting based on investors perceived risk. Something is not right - perhaps low density flash is going to become a commodity, perhaps SSTI's numbers don't add up, perhaps fabless is in error, insider selling, balance sheet...what?...it could be a hundred different things, but something isn't right. What is it? If you didn't know a thing about flash and asked some 25 yr. old broker on the phone about SSTI, what would he come back with? Just curious. I do hope all the longs see a nice long ride upwards in 2001. Best of luck, Eric

To: add who wrote (1379)	12/19/2000 11:55:07 PM
From: hueyone	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1881

You know there are 17 million shorters of this company, but for some reason not one of them has ever come forward and made a convincing case as to what is wrong with this company. I find that very strange. I have even subjected myself to Yahoo on occasion looking for a reason and cannot find anything. For that matter, I have not seen any company specific reasons for the downgrades from any analysts either. If anyone has any specific information, I would like to see it. I am not willing to conclude that something is wrong with this company simply because the market is giving the company a very low valuation. This is the same market that gave Yahoo a valuation of $250 per share and CMGI a value of $263 per share less than 52 weeks ago. Was the market correctly valuing these company's business prospects then? The market can get values wrong on both the upside and downside. Best, Huey