SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (22981)12/19/2000 4:06:49 PM
From: 5dave22Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Tench <I don't if you've noticed or not, but AMD has been sitting on a huge price/MHz advantage for many months now. And that "advantage" can only grow as inventories continue to build and AMD continues dropping prices through the floor.

Don't you guys even wonder what impact this is obviously having on AMD's ASP, or the ultimate impact on AMD's profitability and future prospects? Or are you guys way too focused on the impact to Intel's business to notice the corresponding impact to AMD's?>

This is very far from the truth. AMD can continue to build market share, even in a shrinking economy. Intel can not. PIII is maxed. PIV performance is questionable, and everyone now knows it.

Of course the wild card is what AMD can actually come up with over the next year, and whether they are intelligent enough to market their products to the right people. I'm betting on it, but now with a very small percentage of my portfolio.

<NAZ closed at 2511, ack!>

Regards,

Dave



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (22981)12/19/2000 4:37:00 PM
From: Dan3Respond to of 275872
 
Re: AMD has been sitting on a huge price/MHz advantage for many months now

Actually, that's not true, especially at the low end. The additional infrastructure costs AMD has faced meant that its chips effectively sold for $35 to $50 more than the prices suggested, especially in comparison to Intel pricing.

That ended this week - if AMD leaves prices the same, the market (and Intel) sees a $40 price cut, while AMD revenues are unaffected.

Except for the jump in sales volume.

:-)

Dan



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (22981)12/19/2000 8:19:33 PM
From: DRBESRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
re: "Or are you guys way too focused on the impact to Intel's business to notice the corresponding impact to AMD's?"

The impacts that I see are twofold:

1. AMD is very successfully buying inteL's market. while, at the same time becoming more profitable more consistently than it has ever before been historically.

2. Much of inteL's investment in existing equipment and corresponding infrastructure is relatively suddenly becoming worthless.

COMMENTS?

Patient Regards,

DARBES



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (22981)12/19/2000 8:29:21 PM
From: Joe NYCRespond to of 275872
 
Tenchusatsu,

I don't if you've noticed or not, but AMD has been sitting on a huge price/MHz advantage for many months now. And that "advantage" can only grow as inventories continue to build and AMD continues dropping prices through the floor.

Don't you guys even wonder what impact this is obviously having on AMD's ASP, or the ultimate impact on AMD's profitability and future prospects? Or are you guys way too focused on the impact to Intel's business to notice the corresponding impact to AMD's?


In oil equivalent, Intel is the Saudi Arabia, AMD is nobody, like let's say Angola. It is up to Intel to maintain production to assure price stability. The Angolas of the world always cheated on their quotas.

Joe



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (22981)12/20/2000 9:42:35 AM
From: that_crazy_dougRespond to of 275872
 
<< Don't you guys even wonder what impact this is obviously having on AMD's ASP, or the ultimate impact on AMD's profitability and future prospects? Or are you guys way too focused on the impact to Intel's business to notice the corresponding impact to AMD's? >>

Surely you jest! No one here is rooting for intel to lose, they all just want AMD to win.. Especially Jerry Sanders, right?