SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sharp_End_Of_Drill who wrote (82239)12/20/2000 8:51:08 PM
From: kollmhn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Sharp-
As I said, I wasn't trying to promote the NG argument. However, you have pointed out, rightfully so, that the situation is growing more dire as time goes by.
Frankly, it is a case of THE FUNDAMERNTALS DO MATTER. I've read the contrary on this board and the writer couldn't be more wrong.
The fundamentals may change. Let them. Until there is even a hint of that happening, we are at the mercy of the weather. And.....so far, that ain't easing the shortage.

Short gold?



To: Sharp_End_Of_Drill who wrote (82239)12/21/2000 1:15:29 AM
From: energyplay  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Bigger Orifices ?

Sharp wrote -

" Don't tell me producers aren't tempted to go with one or two orifice sizes bigger to achieve a harder drawdown with $9 gas - within the limits of
physical damage to the wells (they hope). "

I know one company that told me they we doing exactly that -
taking the risk at the high prices. They may loose a well or two, but gain overall. They carefully select the wells, however.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News