SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (82433)12/22/2000 8:42:34 PM
From: excardog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Douglas this may help in keeping power prices high:

Bridge Outlook 2001: Expect Delays for New US Power Plants


Dec. 22-MAR--

By David Givens and Tina Kozak, BridgeNews
Santa Fe, N.M.--Dec. 22--New power plants proposed in the United
States for 2001 will see delays in their construction schedules, industry
analysts told BridgeNews, but don't expect developers to cancel their
plans altogether.
* * *
In a tightly guarded power industry, more than a dozen big merchant
developers declined to answer even general questions about the power
generation outlook. According to Judah Rose, senior vice president at
consultant ICF Kaiser, there's a lot of signaling and strategic behavior
among these companies as they try to position to be the first to build
plants in a certain area.
At the same time, Salomon Smith Barney says the consensus view
overestimates
new generating capacity additions. "Generally, plants continue on until
they are approved, so it's delay after delay," said Chris Ellinghaus of
the power and natural gas team at the investment banking house.
Chris Seiple, director of supply side consulting at RDI Consulting
also said longer-term postponements were more likely than actual
cancellations in some areas. RDI estimated in October that only seven
percent of all new power projects were canceled or were facing a long-term
delay.
A recent Salomon Smith Barney report, using various natural gas
production growth assumptions, said that, of the 135,000 Mw planned for
2001 and 2002, maybe 27,000 to 45,000 will make it on-line.
"Keep an eye on gas production increases, and that shows how many
power plants there will be," Ellinghaus added.

SOME AREAS WILL LAG IN THE RACE TO BUILD NEW PLANTS
Utilities and marketers found huge opportunities for profits in
trading power since deregulation came to the wholesale side of the
industry five years ago. The best way to play in this market is to have
plants of your own, and now utilities and merchant generators alike find
themselves in a race to build gas-fired units.
"It is probably safe to assume not all these projects will be built on
this timetable," said Jackie Olson, spokeswoman for the Mid-America
Interconnected Network. She added that capacity additions in the region,
which comprises Illinois and parts of Missouri and Wisconsin, would match
or slightly exceed demand growth for the near term.
Some states on the East and West coasts are going to lag, however. In
California, consultant Cambridge Energy Research Associates says "local
community opposition alone has struck down some key proposed facilities."
The state recently tried to kick-start its lengthy licensing for plants
that pose no significant environmental impact, which has prompted a Texaco
subsidiary to try to bring the 320 Mw Sunrise plant on-line by May.
A BridgeNews analysis found that only one major new power plant, the
480 Mw El Dorado unit in Nevada, came on-line this year in the five
populous Far West states. A few low-capacity dams and wind projects were
also added.
Western state governors supported expedited and incentive-based
construction
of new power plants at an emergency meeting to discuss power shortages
Dec. 21.
"Political and regulatory uncertainty is not an incentive to new
plants," Pacificorp CEO Alan Richardson said at the meeting. "We need to
stabilize the marketplace in this regard."

NORTHEAST ALSO SEES OBSTACLES TO NEW PLANTS
In the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) Interconnect, Rose said
one of the biggest obstacles will be the availability of transmission and
the cost of transmission upgrades. The Interconnect operates the grid and
a system to determine real-time prices.
Steve Herling, manager of system coordination at the Interconnect,
said that in northern New Jersey, for instance, projects are going to be
interdependent. The first new plants in line will have lower costs of
transmission tie-ins, but subsequent applicants will be looking at more
charges for incremental upgrades to the grid.
Without sufficient voltage or pressure to get into the grid,
electricity remains displaced by existing flows of power.
Herling said a project has a 25% chance of making it through the first
stage of PJM's approval process. "Sometimes the developers have not done
serious homework," he said.
Nearly 7,000 Mw are in the queue in PJM for arrival on-line by the end
of 2001. But based on his past experience, Herling said only 3,000 to
3,500 Mw will actually get built.
In adjacent New York state, Rose said there are no new units on the
board for next year because of excessive bureaucratic delays. And
opposition from the local populations can delay or halt a project in New
England, he said.

DEVELOPERS APPLY FOR MORE PLANTS THAN THEY EXPECT
Plants in development for operation in 2001 were grossly
overestimated, Ellinghaus said, and supplies are going to be tight. "There
is far less in construction to meet the amount initially indicated," he
added.
For 2001, Salomon Smith Barney estimated only about 25,000 of the
64,780 Mw that's been announced would come on-line during the year.
That estimate might be safe, given that a BridgeNews analysis has
verified that 24,378 Mw of new generation has come on-line in the United
States in 2000.
"Some developers have said they try to get one plant built for three
applied for," Ellinghaus said. "Maybe if you use that rule of thumb, you
come out with what people want to build anyway." ICF's Rose called this a
good strategy.

FORWARD POWER CURVES CONFIRM 2001 WILL BE TIGHT
Salmon Smith Barney confirms there will be little excess power next
year with forward power curves in the over-the-counter markets, which are
higher in 2001 than 2000 for all power hubs.
For instance, at the Mid-Columbia interties in Washington state, the
third quarter for next year sold at $280 Mw/hr in the middle of this
month. This year, daily pricing in the third quarter averaged $156.32,
according to the Price Waterhouse Coopers PowerTrax database.
Using an example in the eastern U.S., at the Cinergy hub in Indiana
and Ohio, May 2001 was valued Dec. 21 at $55.75. May 2000 dailies averaged
$43.99.
Pacificorp is a unit of Scottish Power. End

Kelly Hettler contributed to this story.



To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (82433)12/23/2000 11:35:04 AM
From: excardog  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 95453
 
Douglas

This may in fact be the bail out that Slider said AG would not be a party to. Who says Greenspan won't help out. I don't remember AG ever meeting with a Governor. Might be time to go long the CA utilities.

link:http://quote.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?ptitle=Top%20Financial%20News&s1=blk&tp=ad_topright_topfin&refer=topfin&T=markets_bfgcgi_content99.ht&s2=blk&bt=ad_position1_topfin&middle=ad_frame2_topfin&s=AOkOuaRTWR3JlZW5z


12/22 14:41
Greenspan, California Governor Gray Davis to Meet (Update1)
By Mark Lake and Liz Goldenberg

New York, Dec. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan agreed to meet California Governor Gray Davis on Tuesday as California faces an energy crisis that threatens to put its two biggest utilities into bankruptcy.

``Davis asked for this,'' said Steve Maviglio, spokesman for Davis. ``He wants to talk with him about the electricity situation in California and see if he has any ideas.''

The meeting, to take place in Washington, comes as Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and Southern California Edison struggle under $8.1 billion of losses stemming from soaring power costs and regulations barring them from raising prices.

Fed officials have called Wall Street dealers who underwrite the companies' short-term debt, or commercial paper, as well as analysts, seeking information on the effect of the crisis in the markets, two dealers said. A Fed spokeswoman didn't provide further information. A default on a company's commercial paper typically triggers defaults on its other debt. The two utilities combined debt load is more than $20 billion.

As the overseer of the U.S. banking system, the Fed monitors potential financial crises for any possible ripple effect that could hurt the economy.

With growth slowing and banks curbing lending, ``a credit issue can pose the potential to become a systemic threat,'' said Jim Glassman senior U.S. economist at Chase Securities. ``What is a strictly an event not related to the economy in a narrow sense could fuel the fears of other issues like this.''

Power Losses

Edison, in a regulatory filing this week, said it may have no choice but to seek bankruptcy protection, while the state has considered blackouts if the utilities can't continue buying power.

By meeting with Greenspan, Davis may have an easier time pushing through a rate increase, which, while unpalatable to consumers, would provide the utilities with some relief. The California Public Utilities Commission, which must approve rate increases, yesterday said they would hear arguments about a price rise next week, though the earliest they would bring the issue to a vote would be Jan. 4.

``The commission made a late first step when they should be running,'' said Paul Patterson, an analyst at Credit Suisse First Boston who has ``hold'' ratings on both companies.

Shares of San Francisco-based PG&E Corp. -- the parent of Pacific Gas and Electric -- ose 69 cents to $18.94 in afternoon trading. They fell 12 percent yesterday. Shares of Rosemead, California-based Edison International -- which owns Southern California Edison -- fell 31 cents to $14.63. They fell 16 percent yesterday.

Debt Load

In addition to the losses, PG&E has a commercial paper program of $1.85 billion, some or most of which may come due within the next four weeks.

Southern California Edison has a commercial paper program of $1.6 billion. Both companies are under review for a possible debt ratings cut from Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's, effectively barring them from issuing new commercial paper.

Under typical circumstances, the companies would use backup credit lines to refinance the commercial paper if they couldn't issue new commercial paper.

``The commercial paper market is the lifeblood of the credit markets,'' said Tom Gallagher, a Washington-based at ISI Group Inc. ``If all of the sudden there's a problem there, credit markets can freeze up really fast.''

Borrowings

In the case of PG&E, the company has borrowed up to its authorized limit, including part of a $1 billion backup line arranged by Bank of America Corp. two months ago, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. The California PUC yesterday granted the utility's request to raise an additional $2 billion with long-term debt.

PG&E's existing long-term debt stood at $6.5 billion as of Sept. 30, according to a filing with the SEC. Edison International had $12.5 billion in long-term debt as of Sept. 30, a separate SEC filing showed.

Southern California Edison recently asked Chase Manhattan Corp. to renew a $1 billion credit line to back up its $1.6 billion commercial paper program, according to people familiar with the matter. A number of the company's lenders, including Bank of America, balked at lending because of concerns that losses may force the company into bankruptcy.

California has faced the prospect of blackouts because electricity providers in the U.S. Northwest refused to sell power to the utilities over concerns they couldn't pay. Rolling blackouts were averted earlier this month after state and federal agencies provided last-minute supplies.

PG&E serves San Francisco and the surrounding area. Edison is serves the area around the city of Los Angeles, which itself has a municipal utility, the Department of Water and Power.

The California Independent System Operator, which manages the state's power grid, yesterday said it may cut power to some industrial users after electricity reserves dropped again. It is the 35th time the operator has declared a so-called stage two emergency.