Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (130101)	12/26/2000 4:05:23 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571373

Its really too bad that all you professed pro-military types don't really understand the concepts you so readily support. The truth is you have already provided the answer as to why its of little benefit to build a star wars..... Ted, OK...I admit it, I am stumped. What is the answer to which you refer that so readily escapes me too? ...and why it was not built when it first was proposed. I always assumed that it was not built because the technology was not yet developed. Al

To: tejek who wrote (130101)	12/28/2000 12:53:53 AM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571373

Re <<I have no idea what an ICBM is. Thank you for pointing that out.>> You are very welcomed, Re <<The truth is you have already provided the answer as to why its of little benefit to build a star wars.....and why it was not built when it first was proposed.>> I did not defend the existing technology or claimed to have any insight as into why it would or would not be feasible. I was emphasizing the need for such a technology to be developed if possible. You were the one that said such a technology already exists so there is no reason to duplicate it. I see that you have corrected yourself. Mani