SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Currencies and the Global Capital Markets -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (2711)12/26/2000 2:14:06 PM
From: Robert Douglas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3536
 
Fortunately for the 13 colonies, their people enjoyed a common origin and heritage
overall and spoke the same language.


Not as much as you might think.

Message 15078990

Try to remember - Virginia was founded by Protestants - Maryland was Catholic and
tolerant - Pennsylvania was founded by the Quakers - Massachusetts was founded by the
Pilgrims - New York was founded by the Dutch - Louisiana was founded by the French -
the people who lived in the states didn't want to lose their identity. Each state approaches
state government in a different way.

Proper government of a country as large and as populous as the United States must be
decentralized - otherwise, the big cities will control the rural areas in such a way as
benefits the big cities at the expense of the rural areas. This is unacceptable to the rural
areas, and that's why the Electoral College was adopted, and why it will never be
abandoned.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (2711)12/26/2000 2:59:14 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen  Respond to of 3536
 
Agreed. Long term success of economic union requires political union. And I believe that the politicians behind the Euro believe that as well. But they realize that if that had been part of the original proposal for the Euro it would have killed the Euro. The Euro becomes the Trojan Horse that ushers in political union. It is worth remembering that the original ancestor of the EU, the European Coal Board, was intended to tie the economies of France and Germany closer to each other largely to reduce the prospect of another war between the two. The EU has always had greater political union as a vehicle for controlling a powerful Germany as a central, though rarely voiced, goal. It is worth noting that the timetable for currency union was much longer term prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union. Once the Soviets collapsed it opened up Eastern Europe for economic development by the West. Germany was uniquely positioned geographically, culturally and economically to be the major player. The European political elites that had lived through WWII, including the Germans, were extremely nervous about Germany becoming even more powerful. The timetables for economic union were accelerated rapidly as a means of tying Germany to the West. There were some fascinating comments by senior European politicians at the time, including one by Kohl explicitly warning of potential military conflict if economic union wasn't pursued.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (2711)12/26/2000 5:10:18 PM
From: Stephen O  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3536
 
Surely WW 1 and WW 2 were the europeans civil wars, before the late entry of the US into the 2 conflicts. As regards language just about all the well educated younger people of Europe speak English as a second language. I think too that you will find it much harder to put armies in the field to fight stupid wars. The appalling loss of life in WW 1 just would not happen now, the troops would revolt against their officers.
As regards Quebec, the separatists are in retreat now.