Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mst2000 who wrote (119575)	12/26/2000 4:26:38 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

I disagree. I read it as 7-2 on equal protection and 5-4 on the remedy. JLA

To: mst2000 who wrote (119575)	12/26/2000 5:55:54 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

mst2000 I'd tell you to learn how to read but I think it is in comprehension that your posts indicate you are retarded. So you say "Souter and Breyer) both stated unequivocally that they would not have taken the case at all, " Ok show me where! watman.com you see I've made it easy for one to make a point or be caught in mis-comprehension. Seven Justices of the Court agree that there are constitutional problems with the recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court that demand a remedy. See post, at 6 (SOUTER, J., dissenting); post, at 2, 15 (BREYER, J., dissenting). The only disagreement is as to the remedy. Because the Florida Supreme Court has said that the Florida Legislature intended to obtain the safe-harbor benefits of 3 U. S. C. Section 5, JUSTICE BREYER's proposed remedy -- remanding to the Florida Supreme Court for its ordering of a constitutionally proper contest until December 18 -- contemplates action in violation of the Florida election code, and hence could not be part of an "appropriate" order authorized by Fla. Stat. Section102.168(8) (2000). Per Curiam * * * None are more conscious of the vital limits on judicial authority than are the members of this Court, and none stand more in admiration of the Constitution's design to leave the selection of the President to the people, through their legislatures, and to the political sphere. Tom Watson tosiwmee for any of you techno nerd weinies out there, this might be of interest. Message 15083726 the script that is.

To: mst2000 who wrote (119575)	12/26/2000 7:59:29 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

All your points have been dissected by myself and many other members of this board during the past few weeks. And it's tiresome to repeat things over and over. I recommend you do some serious inquiry before typing the latest Democrat talking point spin lines. What happened, did watching weeping Slick Willie being pampered by Dan Rather yesterday get your dander up? Attempt to re-write history and events all you wish. Silly rhetoric won't work on this board. There are too many intelligent posters who visit here.