To: jlallen who wrote (119688 ) 12/31/2000 3:00:19 AM From: D. Long Respond to of 769667 I agree with you wholeheartedly. I hate to say it, but I think one of the best things to do would be to drop athletics from public schools. That is not a very popular thing to say, but I believe it would do much good for the system. 1. it would reduce costs of supporting public athletics, which only represents a minority of the school population in any case. Children who wished to participate in athletics could participate in after hours community organized athletics programs, just like little league, soccer, and many adult athletics groups are organized. 2. Removing athletics from the public school would remove participation in athletics as a dividing social factor in public school. 3. Education should be constrained to basics - reading and writing, mathematics, history and the humanities. ie a proper liberal arts grounding. Another matter that should be investigated, IMO, is all year schooling. The justification of summer break was that children needed to help out in the fields, which obviously no longer applies to the vast majority. The system wastes effort by reteaching the same thing year after year after year. I can not remember any subject matter that could not have been condensed and done with by the time I was 16. Something else that would be worth looking at is the German model of trade schools. Not everyone is served by going to college, and a lot of skill is wasted by shunting aside the "unambitious" kids to "flunky" classes. Perhaps if you challenged them with subjects they are suited to and enjoy, they wouldn't seem so unambitious. I think someone who rebuilds a classic car on the weekends for fun is just as worthy of an education as someone who solves quadratic equations on the weekends for fun. Just some of my opinions. :) Derek