SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marginmike who wrote (90826)12/27/2000 8:43:01 PM
From: Jordan Levitt  Respond to of 152472
 
<<Qcom at 50-70 times 2001 E is not cheap. However it is a microsofteen manopoly. >>

Happy Holidays Mike !
I agree with your position. Warren Buffett says look for businesses that have motes built around them. That is the mighty q !
All the best and happy New Year !
Jordan



To: marginmike who wrote (90826)12/28/2000 9:32:54 AM
From: Rajala  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
QCOM´s WCDMA? Its like saying MSFT is Apple´s technology.

Sure there are IPR claims. There may be even some revenue for Q. But not much.

If I´m not mistaken, the current theory on the thread (and generally on the market judging by the P/E ratio) goes like this:

E, N, S, A et al sit peacefully at the table writing the standard for future global telecommunications. Q refuses to come in but scratches the doors, talks gobbelygook and makes a general nuisance of himself. What do the others do? They decide en masse to bake into the standard a bunch of indisputable IPR´s of Q that can not be economically circumvented. They take the magnum .44 and each one shoots himself on the foot.

Come on, marginmike, even you are not that stupid.

Furthermore, the supposed complete lack of logical thought of E, N, S, A does not stop here. See how desperately they are trying to strike a deal with Q? Like, er, not very desperately. Only E got it accidentally when taking over the infra. But before this they clearly and consistently denied of needing any of Qs IPR.

In fact they seem not to be interested in it at all. These guys apparently are not interested at all in making any money with 3G. Oh, well.

- rajala