Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (34428)	12/27/2000 11:36:50 PM
From: tekboy	Respond to of 35685

much better. now was that a real compliment or just a paper one?

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (34428)	12/28/2000 11:23:30 AM
From: Noneyet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

In response to your nonsense PM, you can do whatever it is you wish with your SI ignore feature, but do not forget two important items. The first is that it was you uncle frank who began PM ing me and secondly and more importantly "you never did respond to the fact that you made two directly opposite conclusions yesterday regarding voltaires trading being real. You also failed to apologize to JHP for your rudeness to him. Now you have been placed on ignore. C-Lok

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (34428)	12/28/2000 1:14:17 PM
From: jambo-bwana	Respond to of 35685

Unctuousness = Uncle Frank Thanks for reminding me.

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (34428)	12/28/2000 2:52:21 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

Hey, Frank: As you are the one who 'runs' ... ... this board <ROFLMAO -- the irony is delicious>, I've been thinking that you might once again be inclined to rename it and develop the latest umpteeth 'mission statement' that I believe you thread heads refer to as the 'thread header,' correct? I think you should rename it "The Whistleblowers' Thread." What do you think, big guy? hahahahahahahahahahahaha 'b-i-a' ###