Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SE who wrote (42900)	12/28/2000 9:37:30 AM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44573

Kool Pic. I've heard of Hans Hannula but I do not recall where. I've read his stuff before but it must have been a few years. From your second link, Market AstroPhysics is the study of how the solar energy field affects markets. The basic theory is that the planets, moving around the sun, change the flow of ionized particles to the earth. This ion stuff is getting real common these days, no? Now that the market is open I'll have to look at this more closely when I have moments as the day goes on. No, I have not seen this site before, I do not think. Unless it was changed from whatever I was looking at a few years ago. EDIT For some reason I think Hank Camp mentioned Hans Hannula to me. Do not recall the gist of the conversation though.

To: SE who wrote (42900)	12/28/2000 12:13:51 PM
From: virtualsignal	Respond to of 44573

happenstance... By Jeff Cooper ... As I mentioned earlier, today is interesting for more than one reason. There is another more esoteric reason. As you know, stocks and markets often seek equilibrium. They seem to vibrate from one point in price to another with amazing symmetry. W.D. Gann was known to have spoken about the Law of Vibrations, but never really explained it. Well, if you take one important turning point, namely the September 3, 1929, high and count out 55-squared weeks (in other words, 3025 weeks) and take it forward, you arrive precisely at August 25, 1987, the high before the '87 crash. Fifty-six-squared weeks takes you to October '89, the Nasdaq high prior to a one-year, 30% decline. Fifty-seven-squared weeks out takes you to December 10, 1991, the low before an explosive rally. Fifty-eight-squared weeks out takes you to February 22, 1994, days from a secondary top and a market that went down into December. Fifty-nine-squared weeks out takes you to May 21, 1996, one day from the closing high on May 22, which led to a big tech decline into July. Sixty-squared weeks out takes you to September 1, 1998, the exact day of the panic low in 1998 on the Dow. Sixty-one-squared weeks out is December 27, 2000. Is today a high or an acceleration point? By the way, 25 weeks squared (625 weeks) from the crash low in 1987 was mid-October 1999, the pivot point for the Nasdaq champagne and run for the roses. Gee, but maybe this is all just happenstance.