Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jmootx who wrote (65418)	12/28/2000 5:57:04 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

Nope I think it is important to keep in mind that 2002 are congressional election and the economy must be humming by then if republicans want to keep it. So it is a dangerous play with the economy memories fade but not if losses are substantial. RE is usually lagging the stock market and is the most important asset in all families, being under water with your mortgage will not place a republican in congress. BWDIK Haim

To: jmootx who wrote (65418)	12/28/2000 7:01:46 PM
From: Crimson Ghost	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

My interest rate take is a bit different. Greenspan will cut, but much less than many on Wall Street predict even if Bush proposes just a modest tax cut. The sharp rally in cyclical stocks of late is bound to raise questions as to how bad the economic outlook really is. The bond rally is just about over IMHO. I doubt that Greenspan will cut more than 50 BP during the first half of 2001 unless the OLD ECONOMY stocks tank over the next few months. The sharp drop in the dollar of late is another factor that will keep Greenspan from cutting too aggressively.