To: Rande Is who wrote (44439 ) 1/3/2001 7:53:01 PM From: Steven Finkel Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57584 Rande: Before you get all riled up at Jason, I think what he is getting at is that it is often hard to know the direction that you, or the thread is taking. What do I mean by this? OK... You come up with portfolios at the beginning of the year of your free accord, and state that they are long portfolios and are not to be traded throughout the year. You also have posted incredible results for portfolios from 1999 on the home page. Now anyone who attempts to blame you for stocks they bought and did not do well on is crazy. The only one responsible is the individual who bought x,y or z company. BUT... for the person who saw these lists at the beginning of the year, choose to buy some or all, and held throughout the year, the truth is, they have most likely lost their shirt. There are an astounding number of stocks in the portfolios that you picked that have lost 70, 80, 90 and even 98% of their value. I am sure that you will agree, the point of a portfolio is to diversify risk. You hope to have an overall gain, but to me, a portfolio that may or may not have done well because one or two out of 30 went way up is a failure. So I can see why some individuals, who see the portfolio performance from 1999 touted on the thread's home page, are upset at perceived attempts to downplay awful performance, or statements such as, we sold out of the portfolios in march. Second, I don't think many understand the hybrid form of trading, and get confused when you will have a stock listed in a long port, and then are talking the next day about how you sold out of that particular security. In fact, I must admit that I (who have been following the thread since the early BAMM, ONSL and SIEB days) am confused. I thought that the long ports were never traded, just the swing/momentum shares,etc. The upshot is, as you have often alluded to, this thread is about making US better traders as a community. We should be willing to DD, share information and ideas so that the thread and the individual investor can do better. I fear, however, that many are still confused about this, and despite your pleas to not be blind sheep, still buy when Rande says buy. No one can predict the future, thus everyone, no matter how good an investor can't always be right. You personally have been right MANY times. I remember the incredible victories on stocks such as KTEL SIEB ONSL CLEV RNWK LPTH and I could go ON and ON and ON. But you have also missed. I remember a prediction of 200 by this past april on ATHM. The point is, we have ALL MISSED, and often. I hope that we can return to the days of helping each other, and succeeding again. To do this, I think there needs to be perhaps a re-statement of your trading style so that when you state that you are selling stock x y or z, there aren't individuals wondering, didn't he just say he was buying this two weeks ago long term? FINALLY: A bit of a disclosure to the thread. Like many this year, I have lost money. I blame NO ONE but myself. In fact, I have learned a great deal this year, and fortunately it has not cost me a house or anything like that. I have posted the above with sincerity in the hopes to return to what I remember as the best source of help and advice on investing anywhere. I have learned an incredible amount on this thread over the years, and am PROUD to call Rande my friend. He has personally taken his time to respond to my emails, and has spent a great deal of his time running the thread. We all owe him a great deal of thanks. My contribution: I recognize that not many are too eager to buy tech right now, even though historically this is probably the best time. The only stock that I feel I know enough about right now to recommend is FBCE. (Disclosure: I do own shares long)I will be happy to post new DD on FBCE to the thread if people are interested. HAVE A GREAT NEW YEAR EVERYONE!