SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WCOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (8387)1/2/2001 5:47:57 PM
From: silicon warrior  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11568
 
JDN:
I'm with you. I also believe that Mr. Greenspan's rate rises and talk had a significant part in generating the worst loss of wealth in history. He and his cronies are essentially racist and class-centric. They saw common people acquiring wealth and called it a public policy problem--"The Wealth Effect"--translated as, Oh Sh*t, now "they" have wealth too. Although the Fed cannot be held responsible for the entire slow down, it sure was the catalyst, and we are now in a truly frightening situation. The NASDAQ is a major index. Already off more than 54%---and, Greenspan doesn't care, cause his cronies all own Philip Morris. I'm surprised there hasn't been more outcry, or even violence.
The Antitrust division had it all so wrong, it's pathetic.



To: JDN who wrote (8387)1/2/2001 7:36:26 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 11568
 
JDN, Do you mean to suggest that Janet Reno was not chosen because she was the best America had to offer? Oh - it cannot be. You would not possibly think that Mrs. Slick only picked Ms. Reno because she found a woman who did not cheat on thier housekeepers SS!

Gee, how could Dubya ever find someone better?

Bob

PS: Did Janet look like America?