SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: limtex who wrote (91105)1/3/2001 2:15:33 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
You need to see the cost of a call by a roamer in one country to another. The charges are stratospheric.

For the countries I spent most time in, this is simply not true. There is no difference for me whether I am calling to either Canada/US from either Canada/US. The roaming rates in Euro countries (mainly Balkan) I spent time in also conflict with your claim: my cost for "local" calls is virtually the same as if I were using a locally activated phone and my cost for mobile long distance back to North America is the same as if I were making the call from a landline.

I don't know, maybe I'm lucky, and if someone has different data for different countries I'd be interested in seeing it.



To: limtex who wrote (91105)1/3/2001 2:43:46 PM
From: Rajala  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
>>why will roaming (and CDMA 2000's relative isolation)
>>be an impediment to the usefulness of CDMA 2000 networks?

Thank you limtex for your insightful views on the European GSM cartel in this issue.

There is another theory also. According to that, the impediment to the usefulness of CDMA2000 networks stems from two simple facts:

1) your subscribers don´t roam
2) nobody roams in your network

- rajala