Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (55053)	1/6/2001 9:30:20 PM
From: Don Lloyd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

pearly - I have been studying Keynes a little. Been reading one of Robert Skidelsky's books. ...a balanced account in my view -LOL-.... I never heard of RS, but look in the index for Carl Menger or Ludwig von Mises. If they don't appear, you don't have a useful balance. -g- Read the following overview article for balance - mises.org "Why Austrian Economics Matters by -- Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. ..." "...Government Numbers One final area of theoretical concern that distinguishes Austrians from the mainstream is economic statistics. Austrians are critical of the substance of most existing statistical measures of the economy. They are also critical of the uses to which they are put. Take, for example, the question of price elasticities, which supposedly measure consumer responsiveness to changes in price. The problem lies in the metaphor and its applications. It suggests that elasticities exist independent of human action, and that they can be known in advance of experience. But measures of historical consumer behavior do not constitute economic theory. Another example of a questionable statistical technique is the index number, the prime means by which the government calculates inflation. The problem with index numbers is that they obscure relative price changes between goods and industries, and relative price changes are of prime importance. This is not to say the Consumer Price Index is irrelevant, only that it is not a solid indicator, is subject to wide abuse, and masks highly complex price movements between sectors. And the Gross Domestic Product statistic is riddled with composition fallacies inherent in the Keynesian model. Government spending is considered part of aggregate demand, and no effort is made to account for the destructive costs of taxation, regulation, and redistribution. If Austrians had their way, the government would never collect another economic statistic. Such data is used primarily to plan the economy...." ...if government has to interfere with the conduct of business they, by implication therefore, also have to have an influence in broad economic issues too... This is a bad premise. The proper economic role of government is to guarantee the sanctity of private contracts and private property. Keynes was undoubtedly smart, but he died before he could see that many of his ideas conflicted with reality. Regards, Don