Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (247)	1/10/2001 7:44:31 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I believe that I have a right to home school or send my kids to private schools and not incur the double cost of having to pay for both private and public schools. If you had no kids, would you pay for the private school kids, the public school kids, neither, or both? Karen

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (247)	1/11/2001 9:29:04 AM
From: YlangYlangBreeze	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

So really the "Bill of Rights" should have been the people authorizing the government to ensure certain rights? When we give the government rights, such as the - right to support freedom of expression - the right to protect property rights - rights to our bodies (a property right if you ask me) the gov would then be obligated to do so, no? right to "restrict freedom of expression in their domain" is a property right too, no? I think you mean speech when you talk about freedom of expression on SI, When you say "I don't believe that the government has the right to support your freedom of expression." What do you mean by freedom of expression? If you mean speech, why not say speech? Are you saying I don't have a right to express myself in art, gestures? Are you saying we shouldn't authorize the gov to ensure that I do? curious joelle