SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (283)1/11/2001 6:28:39 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
genuine artistic expression can't have any restrictions whatsoever, or it's simply not genuine.....

Here I would have to disagree. Much very great art has been produced under restriction: patrons, publishers, etc. have always had their say. Virtually everything Dickens wrote was produced for serial publication, under deadline, and had to please an audience. Artists, unless they are independently wealthy (which is rarely the case) have to please someone, or they starve. I simply feel that private patrons generally have better taste - and fewer political agendas - than bureaucrats.



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (283)1/11/2001 9:07:31 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Giving taxpayer money to artists is absurd, especially when those same funds could go to feed a group of starving children.