Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (529)	1/12/2001 1:29:41 AM
From: KLP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 23908

Did you see this? This may be THE reason that Gore REALLY HAD to win...Labor v. Ashcroft The thought of a vigorous attorney general scares union bosses. opinionjournal.com Thursday, January 11, 2001 12:01 a.m. EST With Linda Chavez brought down, Democrats are loudly proclaiming that Attorney General-designate John Ashcroft will be next. Issuing a war declaration against Senator Ashcroft and Interior nominee Gale Norton, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney said, "We pledge to do everything in our power, working with our allies in the civil rights, women's rights and environmental communities to persuade the Senate to reject these nominations." When the Ashcroft hearings commence next week, the Capitol will virtually levitate on the winds of moral dudgeon over Bob Jones University, Missouri Judge Ronnie White and someone's freedom to abort. But these are no more the fundamental issue than an illegal immigrant was in the Linda Chavez episode. The Clinton coterie has been filled with individuals skimming along the edges of federal criminal investigations stifled in the current Justice Department, and have much reason to undermine any incoming Attorney General. John Sweeney, in particular, has to worry about the legal exposure of AFL-CIO Secretary Richard Trumka. Also of Terry McAuliffe, the newly named Democratic National Committee chairman. Both of these figures have been mentioned in one of the most important prosecutions of recent years. In November 1999, former International Brotherhood of Teamsters political director William Hamilton was convicted of fraud and conspiracy in a complex series of schemes to embezzle the union's funds to aid the 1996 re-election effort of then-Teamster President Ron Carey. As presented by prosecutors under Mary Jo White, U.S. attorney for Southern District of New York in Manhattan, the case suggests a criminal conspiracy reaching into the top levels of the Clinton-Gore-Labor network. Since the 1999 Hamilton conviction for fraud and conspiracy, however, the case has gone nowhere. A senior aide to U.S. Attorney White tells us "the investigation is continuing." The Democrats' problem with John Ashcroft is that he looks just like a fellow who might bring such cases back to life. The AFL-CIO's No. 2, Richard Trumka, has in some ways been the union's most visible Democratic powerbroker. He appeared in Iowa as an early and important backer of Al Gore, bestowing crucial public support on the Veep against Bill Bradley. At the Hamilton trial, the prosecution noted that Mr. Trumka was a player in two schemes that went before the jury. In one, according to testimony by a Hamilton co-conspirator, Mr. Trumka and top labor leaders Gerald McEntee of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees and Andy Stern of the Service Employees International Union conspired to make $50,000 donations each to Teamster President Carey's re-election effort, illegal under federal law. None of the men has been charged. In the second scheme, Mr. Trumka allegedly helped launder $150,000 of his union's funds to Mr. Carey through a Democrat-aligned activist group. Mr. Trumka has denied wrongdoing, but when questioned by government investigators asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The AFL-CIO's code of conduct says no officer who takes the Fifth can hold office; John Sweeney waived the rule for Mr. Trumka. Following Al Gore's defeat, Bill Clinton immediately named Terry McAuliffe DNC chairman. Head of the Clinton-Gore re-election effort in 1996 and one-time prospective financier of the Clintons' Westchester home, Mr. McAuliffe worked with one of the key, named co-conspirators in the Hamilton trial, Martin Davis. At the trial, former DNC finance director Richard Sullivan testified that Mr. Davis and Mr. McAuliffe attempted to carry out an illegal scheme in which the DNC would find a donor for the Carey re-election campaign, and in turn the Teamsters would donate money to Democratic groups. Mr. McAuliffe's lawyer has said his client was not involved in any wrongdoing and cooperated with the investigation. Mr. Davis pleaded guilty to conspiring to funnel union funds and agreed to cooperate with the prosecution. But on the eve of the trial, news came that Mr. Davis would not testify. Prosecutors told the presiding judge that his plea bargain was "under review." Mr. Davis still awaits sentencing, as do several other figures in the case. The final call on this and other unsolved mysteries of the Reno-Clinton years will fall to the new Attorney General. There is as well the stalled campaign finance task force at Main Justice, the China spy tangles and Independent Counsel David Barrett's probe into possible obstruction of justice by Justice Department officials in the Henry Cisneros investigation. The pending Southern District investigation threatening Messrs. McAuliffe and Trumka is merely item one in the stakes Democrats have to defend by cutting up Mr. Ashcroft. Yes, some of Mr. Ashcroft's critics want to use his nomination to hyperventilate about abortion and the like. But there are also plenty of reasons Democrats do not want a vigorous Attorney General dedicated to the impartial pursuit of justice. The real threat to his nomination comes from those who seek to impede and obstruct justice.