To: cosmicforce who wrote (3123 ) 1/16/2001 2:27:58 PM From: Daniel Schuh Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6089 So, I went looking for this pithy quote from Alfred North Whitehead, but I couldn't remember enough of it to dig it up. It was something about how people want to just know stuff, not go around having to verify what they believe. Instead, I came up with a couple less pithy bits that may be Whitehead or maybe Charles Hartshorne that you might appreciate.[MT 130][Over the past few centuries] the development of natural science has gradually discarded every single feature of the original common-sense notion. Nothing whatever remains of it, considered as expressing the primary features in terms of which the universe is to be interpreted. The obvious common-sense notion has been entirely destroyed, so far as concerns its function as the basis for all interpretation. One by one, every item as been dethroned. . . . [Yet] this common-sense notion still reigns supreme in the workaday life of mankind. It dominates the marketplace, the playgrounds, the law courts, and in fact the whole sociological intercourse of mankind. It is supreme in literature and is assumed in all the humanistic sciences. ... Philosophy frees itself from the taint of ineffectiveness by its close relations with religion and with science, natural and sociological. It attains its chief importance by fusing the two, namely, religion and science, into one rational scheme of thought. Religion should connect the rational generality of philosophy with the emotions and purposes springing out of existence in a particular society, in a particular epoch, and conditioned by particular antecedents. Religion is the translation of general ideas into particular thoughts, particular emotions, and particular purposes; it is directed to the end of stretching individual interest beyond its self-defeating particularity. Philosophy finds religion, and modifies it; and conversely religion is among the data of experience which philosophy must weave into its own scheme. Religion is an ultimate craving to infuse into the insistent particularity of emotion that non-temporal generality which primarily belongs to conceptual thought alone. In the higher organisms the differences of tempo between the mere emotions and the conceptual experiences produce a life-tedium, unless this supreme fusion has been effected. The two sides of the organism require a reconciliation in which emotional experiences illustrate a conceptual justification, and conceptual experiences find an emotional illustration. (from websyte.com , which was just the first thing google turned up on Whitehead). Ok, a little too verbose to be pithy. Personally, I figure tying specific. neural configurations to anything much above Chomsky's hard-wired grammar is a little tricky. Cheers, Dan.