SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: William H Huebl who wrote (50005)1/17/2001 3:09:26 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 94695
 
The Supreme Court did a flip-flop when they ruled for Bush given the way they have ruled
in past years on the issues mentioned below.

Because of their past rulings, I believe the Supreme Court should have stayed out of
the 2000 election. They named Bushy Jr. as President. Of course, maybe those
who voted for Busy Jr. felt that they should do so since Bush Sr. nominated a few if not
all of them tothe Court--Mephisto
***********************************************************************************************************

"In recent years, the Supreme Court has carried out what some observers call
a states' rights revolution, tilting the federal-state balance toward the states
in a series of 5-4 votes, with Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist leading the majority.

Invoking states' rights, the justices struck down a law that made it a federal crime
to possess a gun near a school, ruled that rape victims cannot sue their attackers
in federal court and shielded state governments from federal age-bias lawsuits filed
by their employees.


However, the justices went against that trend in the presidential election
case last month when they canceled the hand-recount of votes ordered by
the Florida Supreme Court.

The justices' 5-4 ruling, which in effect gave the presidency to Bush,
was determined by the same five justices who ordinarily support states' rights".

******************************************************************************************************

"In Florida, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights on Thursday opened its two-day
hearing investigating voting irregularities. The NAACP and other civil rights groups
filed a class action lawsuit Wednesday in federal court on behalf of black Florida
residents who say they were denied the right to vote in the Nov. 7 election.

``Many black voters in this state are saying we can't trust Florida to protect
our rights to vote,'' she said, noting Bush supports states' rights.

``The irony of that, of course, is that Bush so quickly ran to the Supreme Court
to say Florida couldn't manage its election.''


nytimes.com



To: William H Huebl who wrote (50005)1/17/2001 10:02:14 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
Mephisto knows what I think about Shrub in any case

Analysis of end of Day Closing prices and recommendations in
the US Stock Market, or the Den of Thieves & Swindlers

This is the most effective list, but validate signals. Results
are relative to the SPX and move relative to the SPX - Haim
see more data & info including stock charts from this scan at:
home.nyc.rr.com
and also see Today Charts who are updated every several days

Today is 01/17/101 Remember this is a computer scan only

S&P Closed 1329.45
S&P Change 2.800
P/C Ratio 0.49 Neutral
Recomandation Price Stoch. RSI RSI RS
Change ROC%

SELL SIGNAL ON AND 3.420 82.295 55 -1 -14
SELL SIGNAL ON ANN 27.875 75.051 55 0 -67
SELL SIGNAL ON BMCS 25.625 88.670 69 -5 -15
BUY SIGNAL ON FNM 79.750 24.015 48 3 0
BUY SIGNAL ON HIT 87.125 28.175 41 2 15
SELL SIGNAL ON KM 7.125 85.392 67 -12 -100
SELL SIGNAL ON LSI 22.860 84.148 58 5 -7
SELL SIGNAL ON MU 39.250 71.702 54 0 -4
SELL SIGNAL ON SGI 4.500 81.798 61 -1 -18
SELL SIGNAL ON SIGM 2.063 76.628 54 -4 -13
SELL SIGNAL ON PRST 12.750 82.520 56 -5 -39
BUY SIGNAL ON EWJ 10.875 22.193 42 5 11
SELL SIGNAL ON NSM 27.313 76.682 63 5 -27
SELL SIGNAL ON AV 15.063 90.830 62 -12 -363