SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Machaon who wrote (122333)1/17/2001 2:27:15 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Ashcroft Stands His Ground
Wednesday, January 17, 2001
By John P. Martin

WASHINGTON — Senators continued grilling Attorney General-designate John Ashcroft on Wednesday, probing his record as Missouri's top prosecutor and pressing him to explain how his opposition to abortion and support for gun owners might affect his leadership of the Justice Department.

Larry Downing/Reuters

Tuesday: John Ashcroft speaks during the opening day of his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill.


In the second day of hearings, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee took up where they left off on Tuesday, challenging the 58-year-old Ashcroft with his own words and sparring with Republicans defending President-elect Bush's nominee.

For his part, Ashcroft continued to insist that the conservative values that made him a vocal advocate in the Senate would not influence his ability to enforce the law. Under questioning from Arlen Specter, R-Pa., Ashcroft acknowledged that as Missouri attorney general, he concluded it was unlawful for a Christian group to distribute religious materials on college campuses, despite personally agreeing with the group's message.

Ashcroft Charged With a 'Metamorphosis'

Still, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said she was "deeply puzzled" by Ashcroft's previous testimony and wondered skeptically if she and others were witnessing "a kind of [political] metamorphosis" of the former senator.

Feinstein called Ashcroft "an implacable foe for a woman's right to choose for a quarter century," noting that he had called the legalization of abortion "a miserable failure" and, as Missouri governor, he proclaimed the anniversary of Roe v. Wade a day in memoriam for aborted babies.

But Ashcroft countered that he had at times opposed legislation that would have banned abortions in cases of rape or incest. He also pledged to maintain the Justice Department task force focused on protecting health clinics and said he would not advise Bush to use abortion as a litmus test for any Supreme Court appointments, despite his personal beliefs.

"It's also fair to say that I know the difference between an enactment role and an enforcement role," he said.

When Feinstein noted that Ashcroft opposed legislation to ban assault weapons, Ashcroft conceded that he believed there were "constitutional inhibitions on the rights of citizens to bear arms." Some are good and some are bad, he said. "But as attorney general, it is not my judgment to make that call," he said.

Boycott Brouhaha

Under questioning from Sen. Herbert Kohl, D-Wis., Ashcroft defended his 1979 decision as state attorney general to sue the National Organization for Women when that group launched a boycott to protest the state's decision not to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment.

"The boycott was hurting the people of Missouri and we believed it to be in violation with antitrust laws," he said.

But he was reluctant to weigh in on the antitrust implications of pending airline mergers or the government's ongoing battle with Microsoft, saying he needed to study the cases further.

"I can tell you I believe that competition to me is very important," he said.

Gary Hershorn/Reuters

Tuesday: Ashcroft, in foreground, sits at his hearing with Sens. Christopher Bond, R-Mo., and Kay Bailey Hutchinson, R-Texas.


Again and again, Democrats probed the conservative stances that Ashcroft proudly held in the Senate. Kohl took issue with a statement Ashcroft made two years ago, when he said, "If ever there was a time to unfurl the banner of unabashed conservatism, it is now."

Ashcroft replied that he believed that differing opinions sowed the seed of healthy debate. "If we were all right there in the middle together, we wouldn't need the legislative process," he said. "The legislative process is the process of disagreement; it's the process of debate."

Kennedy in the Thick of Things ... Again

Despite the contentiousness of the issues, the hearing was civil and Kohl acknowledged that Ashcroft is likely to be confirmed. The only sparks occurred during an exchange between Sen. John Kyl, R-Ariz, an Ashcroft defender, and Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who has emerged as Ashcroft's most pointed critic.

Kyl said Kennedy's opening day remarks suggesting that Ashcroft opposed school desegregation and voter registration drives in St. Louis were part of a litany of inaccuracies "distorting Senator Ashcroft's record."

Kennedy fired back, more at Kyl then at Ashcroft. He noted for instance, that the next attorney general might be responsible for overseeing probes into voter registration fraud in Florida. "That might not be important to you, Senator," he said, his voice rising. "But I think it's important to the person who's going to be the head of the Justice Department. And I don't retreat on it!"

The most closely watched of 10 Cabinet nomination hearings this week, Ashcroft's hearing was moved to the famed Senate Caucus Room, the site of such historic events as the McCarthy hearings and the confirmation battle for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

The hearing is expected to continue at least through the end of the week.

foxnews.com



To: Machaon who wrote (122333)1/17/2001 2:38:52 PM
From: H-Man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Would Americans have gotten killed if Poppa Bush had not sent the troops into Somalia ?

No Americans were killed because President Bush Sent them to Somalia. That is fact. The premise of your question is false.

When executing the orders of President Bush, the troops were in central and well defended positions. More to the point, our neutral stance in the armed conflict did not antagonize the warring parties. Clintons actions did just that. It is the sole reason for the deaths of the American soldiers.

I notice you have not provided a response as to why Clinton did not pull the troops out. It was nearly impossible as you put it. BullChit !

Here is some more perspective:

By May 1993, with relief supplies flowing, famine on the wane and the country relatively peaceful, the United States withdrew most of its troops and turned Somalia over to a U.N. peacekeeping force. With almost no planning, the U.N. Security Council broadened the peacekeepers' mandate from securing relief operations to "the rehabilitation of the political institutions and economy of Somalia."

The Clinton administration strongly supported this more aggressive stance. Madeleine Albright, then the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said the goal was "nothing less than the restoration of an entire country."

All of this infuriated Gen. Mohamed Farah Aideed, the warlord whose Somali National Alliance had emerged as the dominant force in Mogadishu. Realizing that the United Nations' peacekeepers would be a far weaker adversary than the U.S. Marines, Aideed immediately began increasing his armed presence in Mogadishu. He also began broadcasting a stream of anti-U.N. invective on Radio Mogadishu, his fury fueled by his antipathy for Egypt, the homeland of U.N. Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali and a steadfast supporter of Mohamed Siad Barre, the dictator Aideed had helped depose two years earlier.



To: Machaon who wrote (122333)1/17/2001 3:59:14 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 769667
 
ABC radio reported some interesting facts about California's power problems this morning:

Five years ago deregulation of the power industry occurred in Ca.

This deregulation was supported by a group of people known as the Confederate Cartel and located in Texas. They were represented through a company called Enron who pumped alot of money into the campaign for deregulation.

A company called Enron bought many of the power producing plants after deregulation was passed.

Enron's chief is a man named Kenneth Lay ( sp?) who is a long- time friend of George W. Bush!!!!!!!!!!

These power plants have increased charges by huge multiples and are now holding Ca. hostage to it's power needs.

Kenneth Lay was going to be Bush's pick for Energy Secretary but he was removed from nomination at the last minute.( I wonder why )

OPEC will now decrease oil production so they can increase prices!

BEND OVER AMERICA......HERE COMES GEORGE W. BUSH



To: Machaon who wrote (122333)1/17/2001 7:36:40 PM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
"Sending Americans into a war torn, lawless region, was an awful idea. What makes it worse, is it was just before Poppa Bush left office, saddling a new President with a mess"

Like I said, looks like our troops will be coming home from Kosovo and Bosnia. Sending Americans into a war torn, lawless region, is a bad idea, but American troops being sent into war torn, lawless regions, is the definition of their job.

What about the escalation of US involvement in Columbia, Barry? Clinton has dipped our feet in a quagmire to rival Vietnam. Just sent a several billion dollar aid package in the last months of his Presidency. Digging us deeper and deeper. US forces ARE in Columbia, providing intelligence to Columbian army and anti-drug units. Im quite sure there are probably "military advisors" in Columbia as well. What do you think about that "awful idea" being "saddled" upon Bush? What do you think about Clinton getting us involved in a "war torn, lawless" jungle thick with civil war and powerful international drug cartels?

Derek