SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Machaon who wrote (122359)1/17/2001 8:42:51 PM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
>><< I guess the troops will be coming home from Kosovo and Bosnia now that Clinton is leaving office then...

Bush has suggested this. Let's see what happens next. Bush doesn't want to use our troops to maintain peace, only to fight wars. He may get his wish by not preserving peace.

But then again, our guys and gals in uniform were supposed to come home from Bosnia YEARS ago. The whole one year commitment thing Clinton promised never quite happened.

Would you have preferred that entire area to be blown up in war and the massacres of hundreds of thousands of innocent families, or for our troops to stay there longer than a year?<<

OK Barry, so what you are saying is that it is acceptable and wise to "put American troops in harms way" in Bosnia, a "war torn and lawless" land, and keep them there INDEFINATELY, to "maintain peace", but it is wicked and evil to do the same in Somalia, for the much more limited goal of escorting food supplies?

I believe this flip flopping is called HYPOCRISY Barry.

Derek



To: Machaon who wrote (122359)1/17/2001 9:36:25 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 769667
 
Nah...I prefer the Clinton mode...just bomb any target to detract from your own misgivings..



To: Machaon who wrote (122359)1/18/2001 12:02:39 AM
From: Andy Thomas  Respond to of 769667
 
--Would you have preferred that entire area to be blown up in war and the massacres of hundreds of thousands of innocent families, or for our troops to stay there longer than a year? --

now you're offering a false choice.

you know it isn't/wasn't that simple. i don't know what your agenda is with regard to this, but you know it's not that simple.

andy